Fifth Columnists
This page is not a platform for hate, but an attack on the historical blindness of the underdeveloped escapist and the selective outrage that leaves crimes unpunished.
Jewish and Islamic communities share a remarkable amount of cultural and historical heritage. Both traditions observe rituals such as circumcision and specific forms of ritual slaughter, and both are rooted in a broader Semitic history. This shared origin emphasizes that the two groups, despite their current political conflicts, are related in many respects. It is precisely this connection that could form a basis for peaceful dialogue and mutual understanding, without the rest of the world being drawn into the conflict.
A possible path toward de-escalation lies in reconsidering practices and beliefs that were historically shaped in times of conflict. Embracing ideas focused on compassion, mutual respect, and minimizing harm—such as certain ethical approaches within veganism or other peace-oriented rituals-can create space for new forms of cooperation. When both communities see themselves as heirs to a shared history, a foundation emerges where humanity and compassion can take center stage.
Two sides of the same coin: the financing of political polarization
Politics today is polarized along financial lines. On one side are conservative think tanks such as the MEF (focusing on national security and Israel), and on the other are liberal philanthropists like Soros (focusing on open borders and human rights). In both cases, influential actors attempt to steer the European course through financial means.
Geert Wilders: "When I land at the Israeli Ben Gurion airport after a trip, I feel like I'm coming home."
Dominik Tarczyński: "Am Yisrael Chai"
Tommy Robinson: "If there was a war tomorrow, I would be there on the front line fighting for Israel"
The Middle East Forum (MEF) and the influence of George Soros via his Open Society Foundations (OSF) are frequently discussed topics in the debate over political funding. Below is an overview of how this financing works on both sides of the political spectrum and a historical fact check.
Power is a game of bankers. While the left and the right are kept occupied, the digital ID is being prepared for total financial control. And it causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark.


Financing on the Right: The Middle East Forum (MEF) The MEF supports politicians who take a hard line against political Islam and express unconditional support for Israel.
This support is often directed toward legal fees or organizing speaking engagements.
- Geert Wilders (PVV, Netherlands): Wilders is one of the most prominent recipients. The MEF has contributed significant sums to his legal defense in the past (for example, during the "fewer Moroccans" trial).
- Filip Dewinter (Vlaams Belang, Belgium): Dewinter has close ties to Daniel Pipes and the MEF. He is regularly invited as a speaker at conferences (co-)facilitated by them.
- Tommy Robinson (United Kingdom): Although not a member of parliament, Robinson is a key figure on the right who has been explicitly funded by the MEF for legal assistance and demonstrations.
- Other European Politicians: Politicians from parties such as the FPÖ (Austria) and the former Front National (France) have been linked to networks surrounding the MEF, often via think tanks advocating for an "Israel Victory" strategy in the Middle East.
Financing on the Left: George Soros (OSF) On the progressive side, George Soros is the most frequently mentioned financier. His Open Society Foundations provide billions to NGOs and civil initiatives, but rarely directly to individual politicians (due to strict rules on party financing).
- Policy Impact: Soros supports organizations dedicated to migration management, LGBTQ+ rights, and democratization. In countries like Hungary and Poland, he is often portrayed by the ruling powers as the "mastermind" behind the liberal opposition.
- Difference in Method: While the MEF often focuses on the personal legal battles of individual leaders, Soros focuses on changing social infrastructure through organizations.
The Warburg Brothers
During the First World War, these two brothers stood on diametrically
opposite sides of the conflict. Max Warburg remained in Germany as a
banker and advisor to Kaiser Wilhelm II to finance the German war
effort. His brother Paul Warburg had emigrated to the US, where, as a
founder of the Federal Reserve, he advised the American government.
Thus, two brothers simultaneously managed the financial systems of two
warring superpowers.
Halal slaughterhouses
Another fact: in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, mistreatment of donkeys is a documented problem. Organizations such as Safe Haven for Donkeys and Starting Over Sanctuary regularly report cases of donkeys being beaten, overworked with excessively heavy loads, or left with injuries caused by tight chains and ropes. Due to the ongoing war in Gaza, the situation has deteriorated; many animals there are now also suffering from hunger, dehydration, and untreated injuries resulting from violence. Although many owners depend on their donkeys for transport and attempt to care for them, in some areas there is a lack of education and resources for the proper treatment of these working animals.
Kosher slaughterhouses
It is also a fact that in Israel, during the festival of Lag Ba'Omer, incidents have been documented in which animal abuse occurred, such as throwing kittens or puppies into bonfires. These acts are recognized by the Israeli government and animal rights organizations such as Let the Animals Live as serious vandalism. Because of these incidents, the Israeli Police deploy additional patrols and volunteers each year to monitor the bonfires and protect animals.
Dancing Israelis on 9/11
Celebrating Palestinians on 9/11
In today's public debate, it is striking how quickly criticism is neutralized by labels. Those who discuss Israel's policies are sometimes immediately branded as antisemitic. Those who point out injustices within Islamic contexts are quickly labeled Islamophobic. In both cases, the same thing happens: the conversation is terminated before it can substantively begin.
As Dr. Norman Finkelstein — himself Jewish and the son of Holocaust survivors - emphasizes, Zionism is a political ideology and not synonymous with Judaism as a religion or identity. Structurally conflating these two concepts not only hinders debate but also the freedom to critically examine political ideas. A similar confusion arises when criticism of Islamic extremism is automatically interpreted as hostility toward Muslims as a whole. Criticism of ideas, structures, or policies is not the same as criticism of people.
A mature society must be capable of identifying injustices and asking difficult questions without moral labels prematurely blocking the conversation. Only then is there room for nuance, mutual understanding, and genuine progress.


Israel and its Zionism
Palestine with its Hamas
Mossad Shadow Operations: What Happens Behind the Scenes
4 January 2026 (source) "The former Mossad chief of Israel lifts the veil on the country's astonishing assassinations. Just over a week ago, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared that his country is now at war with the U.S., Europe, and Israel. … There is no better organization for that task than the Israeli Mossad, and no better person to speak about it than its former leader, Yossi Cohen. Cohen led the agency from 2016 to 2021. He greets me from a modest office in downtown Tel Aviv. This is a man who, as a Mossad operative, repeatedly went undercover in the Arab world, each time risking torture and death. For Cohen, the Mossad operates according to a single principle – a principle he returns to repeatedly in our interview and in his book Sword of Freedom: Israel, Mossad and the Secret War, which lies between us on the polished table. 'We can't be number two anywhere,' he tells me. 'Be first and be decisive – that is the rule.'"
Mossad is Israel's foreign intelligence agency. In the excerpt above, Mossad is portrayed as exceptionally effective and almost heroic. It is therefore not a neutral analysis, but an admiring, almost promotional piece.
But strikingly, the Mossad was unable to prevent anything on October 7. Such a tragedy then provided exactly the momentum that the Israeli government used to justify the large-scale attack on Gaza, strongly appealing to public emotions and using the fate of the hostages as a political tool.
"We can't be number two anywhere," Cohen said. This is an extremely absolute statement. It suggests that Israeli intelligence agencies must always be the best, regardless of context or reality. It sounds more like a slogan than a sober analysis. And the way assassinations are described as "audacious" and almost heroic, with words like "ruthless," "bold," "professional hit," "masters of hybrid warfare"—that is a tone that conveys admiration rather than objective reporting. The result is less a journalistic account and more a glossy promotional piece for the Mossad.
Charlie Kirk had become particularly critical in his final days
Before he began criticizing, Kirk repeatedly stated that he supported Israel, and Netanyahu has also publicly acknowledged this.

Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University during a Turning Point USA event. He was shot once in the neck from a rooftop approximately 130-142 yards away and pronounced dead at a local hospital.
The suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, surrendered the next day and faces aggravated murder charges, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty. No official motive has been confirmed linking the killing to donor disputes.
Leaked text messages from Kirk, confirmed authentic by TPUSA, show he wrote days earlier that he had "no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause" after losing a major Jewish donor, stating "Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes" amid pressure over his advocacy.
Former CIA officer John Kiriakou has sparked debate after claiming more than 10,000 documents tied to the JFK assassination are still being kept secret.
He suggested the files may never be released, alleging they contain highly sensitive information that could implicate foreign involvement. The claims have not been independently confirmed.
The comments are reigniting long-standing questions around transparency and what may still be hidden decades after one of the most investigated events in U.S. history.
Bibi's Billions: How Netanyahu Fueled the Hamas Coffers for Years
Between 2018 and 2023, Benjamin Netanyahu's government authorized a constant stream of millions of dollars in cash from Qatar into the Gaza Strip. While officially intended for humanitarian purposes, this proved to be a deliberate strategy to keep Hamas in power.
The shocking facts: Every month, 30 to 35 million dollars in suitcases full of cash were brought across the border. In total, over 1.1 billion dollars in Qatari funds flowed into Gaza with the direct approval of the Israeli government.
The goal was a "divide and rule" strategy: by strengthening Hamas in Gaza as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, the Palestinians remained politically divided, and the possibility of a sovereign state was minimized.
Despite warnings from intelligence agencies that this money was being diverted to build tunnels and purchase weapons, the payments continued until just before the October 7, 2023, attacks. Furthermore, in early 2025, the "Qatargate" affair erupted: an investigation is currently underway into Netanyahu's advisors, who may have received personal payments from Qatar to continue promoting this policy.
What many call a strategic blunder or even a historic betrayal stands in stark contrast to international support for the region: The United States provides 3.8 billion dollars in fixed annual military aid to Israel, a figure that has risen to over 21 billion dollars in weapons and ammunition during the 2024-2025 war period. In contrast, Europe provides no military support to the Israeli government; European millions are directed toward humanitarian aid for the Palestinian territories and small-scale civil society projects.
Germany is the only major European player that does provide massive amounts of weapons and components. The German government considers Israel's security a fundamental part of its national interest (Staatsräson). This stems from a deep-seated historical guilt regarding the Holocaust; supporting Israel is viewed as a moral obligation to ensure the survival of the Jewish people. Unlike the American aid, this is not "free money," but without high-end German technology and parts, the Israeli tanks and navy in particular would face major operational challenges.
Critical questions that may be asked
If history is written by the winners and the news by those in power, where does factual truth remain?
ISIS is an Islamic terrorist group that attacks everyone except Israel. How is that possible?
Why have Jews actually been expelled from so many European countries throughout history? People always say, where there's smoke, there's fire. So what was actually going on in these cases?
How realistic is the fear that Muslims will eventually subjugate Western countries, just as happened in the past to the more than 50 countries that now have a Muslim majority?
Why do Jewish organizations in Europe advocate for open borders, while Israel itself has strict border controls and a strict immigration policy?
"Anyone who criticizes Israel will be considered our enemy. We will monitor you through Google, expose your weaknesses, fire you, and if you have a business, bankrupt it."
Why does Egypt keep the border with Gaza largely closed, and which political, security, and international factors play a role in this?
Which role did Larry Silverstein play before and after 9/11, and how coincidental is it that his children, Roger and Lisa, were also not in the WTC that morning because they arrived late? Statistically, what are the chances that both he and his children were precisely outside the affected part of the building at that moment? More questions
If there were a famine in Gaza, why is that not visible in the publicly released footage of these executions? How can we explain this?

Why we should always critically evaluate information
Sometimes claims sound like pure fiction, while reality is more nuanced (or shocking) than we think. Here are some historical examples that show why a healthy dose of skepticism is important:
Contaminated Polio Vaccines
Between 1955 and 1963, batches of the polio vaccine were found to be contaminated with cells linked to cancer, which caused a massive shock in the medical world at the time.
Manipulated Sugar Research
For years, the sugar industry (including Coca-Cola) funded studies that downplayed the health risks of sugar and unfairly shifted the blame toward fats.
Bohemian Grove
It sounds like a movie script, but the world's most powerful leaders do indeed gather annually in a private setting at a heavily secured campground in California. This club is known for theatrical rituals in nature, such as the "Cremation of Care" performed in front of a large owl statue.
Bilderberg Conference
An annual private meeting of approximately 130 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, and media across Europe and North America.
Operation Mockingbird
In the last century, the CIA infiltrated American media by paying journalists to spread propaganda and influencing student organizations. See the statements from Qatar in the video below, and find more about this on Wikipedia here.
Operation Paperclip
Immediately following World War II, the American government secretly brought 1,600 Nazi scientists to the U.S. to work on military projects.
Here is the English translation of the text provided:
Sounds like fiction, but this, too, is a true story:
Analysis of shocking testimonies: From Monterrey to the Epstein files
In 2009, 21-year-old model Gabriela Rico Jiménez drew international attention after she was filmed in a state of distress in Monterrey, Mexico. During her arrest, which followed a private gathering for the elite, she shouted disturbing accusations about murder and claimed that "they ate human flesh." Although authorities at the time attributed her behavior to a mental breakdown, Jiménez disappeared entirely from the public eye after the incident, fueling speculation to this day.
The shocking nature of her statements bears striking similarities to testimonies that surfaced years later in the notorious Epstein files. In documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice, including an official FBI FD-302 report, a male witness likewise makes horrific allegations regarding the American elite. According to this witness, he was not only raped by George H.W. Bush but was also subjected to a violent ritual in which his feet were mutilated with a sword.
The statements in the file, however, go even further.
The witness describes scenes on a yacht where a child was allegedly brutally mutilated and killed, after which those present reportedly engaged in cannibalism and the consumption of human excrement.
While these testimonies appear verbatim in official FBI documents, they remain unconfirmed allegations. An FD-302 report is a record of what a witness stated, not a determination of what actually occurred. To date, no forensic evidence or legal substantiation has been found to support these extreme accusations. The similarity between Jiménez's public outburst and the accounts in the Epstein files raises complex questions about how such claims are weighed by investigative agencies: are they rightly dismissed as psychotic delusions, or do they vanish into the shadows of bureaucracy due to a lack of evidence?
They need Christ...
Islamic terrorist meets Jesus
Orthodox Jew meets Jesus
Are We Importing Foreign Conflicts into Our Own Debate?
Are We Importing Foreign Conflicts into Our Own Debate?
It's understandable that people empathize with conflicts elsewhere in the world. International events evoke emotions, and solidarity is a human response. The problem arises when domestic politics becomes fixated on choosing sides in a foreign conflict, while pressing national issues remain unaddressed. When political parties speak out strongly-one for Israel, the other for Palestine-the focus shifts from domestic priorities to international battle lines.
Meanwhile, the Netherlands faces major challenges: a severe housing shortage, tens of thousands of children growing up in poverty, and infrastructure suffering from a lack of maintenance. Bridges, railway lines, and tunnels are in a state that demands immediate attention. These problems affect the daily lives of people here and demand political focus and decisiveness.
When foreign conflicts become central to domestic debate, we import not only the issues themselves but also the polarization that comes with them. This distracts from what is truly needed: solving the social issues that directly affect our own society.
A mature political landscape should be able to follow international developments without them clouding the view of national responsibility. Only then will there be room for constructive policies and sustainable solutions.Feedback sturen
It remains difficult to understand why the suffering of civilians like Shani Louk-a young woman who refused military service and was known for her pacifist beliefs-receives little attention in some activist circles. Compassion should not depend on political position.
This smug creature is Elisha Yared. He is an illegal Israeli Occupier in the West Bank, Palestine.He was charged of killing a Palestinian teenager in the WestBank. This killer has been moved to house arrest. Not even jail, that is why he is smiling. Yet they want to hang innocent Palestinians they have put into torture camps without trial.
Elisha Yered, the terrorist Israeli settler who killed Palestinian teenager Qusai Mu'tan, 19, in Ramallah on August 4 is the assistant to hard-right lsraeli minister |tamar Ben-Gvir and the former aide and spokesperson for MK Limor Son-Har Melech.
Gush Etzion settler council admits systematic ritual abuse following journalistic investigation

The Gush Etzion Regional Council in the occupied West Bank has issued an unprecedented public admission acknowledging severe, multi-participant ritualistic sexual abuse within the settler community, which involved the gangrape of children.
The official statement marks a dramatic reversal for the settlement's leadership, which had spent years systematically denying and dismissing allegations of sadistic abuse.
The official acknowledgment follows a damning investigative report by journalist Roni Singer on Israel's Kan 11 channel, which aired identical testimonies from five independent victims detailing organized, ritualistic assaults. Confronted with recorded evidence and professional corroboration, the council released a statement denouncing the perpetrators and describing the uncovered acts as "pure evil and a moral distortion."
In an effort to manage the immense public fallout, the settler council published crisis hotline numbers and urged further victims to come forward. The media exposure and subsequent admission are expected to force Israeli police to reopen previously shelved complaints and expand criminal investigations into what is emerging as one of the most organized abuse scandals inside the settlement enterprise.
Distinguishing Judaism from Zionism: A Former Zionist's Perspective
See the email and speech here: Full Speech Of Rabbi Rabbinovitch Found
"Forbid white men to mate with white men. White women must coexist with members of the dark races, white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the white will mean the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become but a memory. We will enter a ten-thousand-year era of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule the world unchallenged. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to maintain power over a world of dark peoples." – Rabbi Rabbinovich
Rose Rabbinovich presents herself as a former Zionist Jewish woman living in Melbourne, Australia.
She claims that Zionism secretly controls Jews and non-Jews, asserts that mainstream Jewish communities are deliberately kept in the dark, and portrays Zionism as a corrupt, or even satanic, force within Judaism.
The piece is presented as a warning to the world and encourages the dissemination of The Protocols, claiming that global conflict will ensue if the "Zionist agenda" is not exposed.
Zionist Sarah Hurwitz on social media, youth, and perceptions of Israel
Sarah Hurwitz, a former speechwriter for Barack and Michelle Obama, considers herself a liberal Zionist. She recently spoke (in 2025) at an event hosted by the Jewish Federations of North America about the influence of social media and unfiltered images of the Gaza conflict on how young people view Israel and the Middle East. Hurwitz pointed out that TikTok and similar platforms constantly expose young people to images of violence and suffering in Gaza. She argues that this constant exposure makes it difficult to have a nuanced conversation about Israel, as young people are already emotionally affected by what they see. She also explained that Holocaust education can sometimes lead to simplified comparisons between historical events and the current situation, as young people interpret the roles of powerful Israelis and vulnerable Palestinians through that historical "Nazi-Jewish" framework. Sarah Hurwitz pointed out that adults, including politicians, academics, teachers, and the media, have a role in providing context and guidance for how young people understand the conflict in Gaza and Israel.Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said in his weekly sermon Saturday night that non-Jews exist to serve Jews
"Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which formed the foundation of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to exemplify that fundamental teaching of our tradition."
Tsunami of similar statements
"The white race is the cancer of human history." – Susan Sontag
"You white people are on an endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won't be any more white people around, and that's a good thing." - Tim Wise
"The goal of abolishing the white race is, on its face, so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists... Keep bashing the dead white males, the living ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed." - Noel Ignatiev
It is understandable why some people then overreact to the above statements and develop tunnel vision: "An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior." - Viktor E. Frankl, said the Austrian neurologist, psychiatrist, and Holocaust survivor.
The Muslim Brotherhood under scrutiny: Arab criticism and experiences
The Muslim Brotherhood is one of the most controversial political and religious movements in modern Arab history. Originally founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the movement grew from a religious reform group into an organization with political ambitions, social structures, and international ramifications. This transformation has led to fierce criticism from various Arab commentators, insiders, and even former members, who strongly condemn the Brotherhood's ideology and operations within their own societies.
One of the best-known Arab critics is Tharwat el-Kherbawy, an Egyptian lawyer and former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. He has repeatedly spoken and written about what he sees as the movement's deception: in his view, the Brotherhood uses Islamist rhetoric to pursue political power, while conflating political interests with religious legitimacy. El-Kherbawy left the organization for precisely this reason and warns that the movement does not have a purely religious mission, but is primarily politically focused on power within the state and society.
Criticism is also emerging within broader Arab opinion. In Egypt itself, after the short presidential term of Mohammed Morsi, who emerged from the Brotherhood, a wide range of citizens and activists openly expressed their disappointment with the organization. Morsi's government, which initially gave many voters hope, quickly lost support as the economy deteriorated and Morsi attempted to consolidate power through decrees that overrode the law. Hisham and Tommy, two secular Egyptian activists who participated in the Tahrir Square protests, ultimately viewed the Muslim Brotherhood as a political force that failed to live up to their expectations and even contributed to new forms of discontent.
Established publicists in the Arab world are also highlighting the problem. Some media outlets and social commentators are criticizing how the Brotherhood is presented by media outlets and political networks and the influence it attempts to exert. In Egypt and beyond, attention was drawn to how reporting on protesters and Brotherhood sympathizers was manipulated to suggest broader support for the movement, while many critics, on the other hand, felt the organization was too unwilling to make genuine democratic reforms.
Beyond Egypt's borders, there are additional Arab perceptions that warn of the Muslim Brotherhood's influence on regional politics and internal stability. In the Gulf region, for example, Qatar's support for the Muslim Brotherhood has caused tensions with other states such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain, which saw the movement as a threat to their own stability and political order.
Critics from these countries speak not only about ideas but about the concrete geopolitical consequences of Brotherhood support and the export of their ideological influence.
In addition, governments in several Arab countries have taken harsh measures against the Muslim Brotherhood because they directly associate this movement with a threat to national security.
For example, Jordan has banned the local branch of the Brotherhood and arrested members on allegations that they threatened state security with paramilitary activities — allegations that resonate across the region and stem from actual political conflicts between governments and Brotherhood structures.
Criticism within the Arab world focuses not only on the Muslim Brotherhood's political practices but also on what critics consider the ambiguity of the ideology itself: public moderation versus the pursuit of religious goals behind the scenes, which leads to divisions within societies. In Egypt and elsewhere, many believe the movement blurs the lines between religion and nationalism to maximize its influence, rather than genuinely supporting an open, democratic, and inclusive political system.
In this sense, the Arab voices criticizing the Muslim Brotherhood are not marginal or merely outsiders: they are former insiders, social commentators, secular and religious Arabs, and even citizens who witnessed the movement's consequences in their own lives and countries during revolutions and protests. Their criticism focuses not only on abstract theories but on concrete experiences of political failure, social unrest, and the perception that religious symbolism is being used as a tool for political power.
While in the West criticism of Islamist influence is dismissed as Islamophobia, countries like the UAE are openly drawing a line:
UAE cuts funding for UK studies amid concerns about extremism on campuses
January 2026 (source) - The United Arab Emirates has removed British universities from its list of foreign institutions eligible for government-funded scholarships. This eliminates government funding for Emirati students wishing to study in the UK.
UAE officials have linked the decision to concerns about Islamist influence on British campuses, particularly from groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which the UAE designates as a terrorist organization. The UK does not ban the Muslim Brotherhood, a long-standing point of contention between the two countries. The policy does not prevent UAE students from studying in the UK with private funding, but degrees from British institutions may no longer be officially recognized for UAE government employment or accreditation purposes.
Ex-Oxford professor of Islamic studies Faces Paris Rape Trial Linked to #MeToo Wave Sparked by Harvey Weinstein
March 2026, UK (source Dailymail)
In March 2026, a French court ruled that Swiss Islamic scholar and former Oxford professor Tariq Ramadan will face a rape trial in Paris even if he refuses to attend in person. Ramadan, 63, is accused of the aggravated rape of three women in France between 2009 and 2016. Although he suffers from multiple sclerosis, medical experts concluded that he is healthy enough to participate in the four-week trial.
The case became widely known during the global #MeToo movement, which began in 2017 after accusations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein prompted many women worldwide to come forward with allegations of sexual abuse.
Ramadan denies all accusations and claims the sexual encounters were consensual.
In 2024, Ramadan was already convicted in Switzerland of raping a woman named Brigitte in 2008 and received a one-year prison sentence.
The upcoming French trial concerns allegations from three women, including feminist activist Henda Ayari, who says Ramadan raped her in 2012, as well as a disabled woman identified as "Christelle," who alleges a brutal assault in 2009, and another woman who says she was raped in 2016. If convicted, Ramadan could face up to 20 years in prison.
After the first allegations emerged in 2017, Ramadan took leave from his position at the University of Oxford, where he had been a senior research fellow at St Antony's College. He later left the university in 2021 due to health reasons. Ramadan has long been a prominent and controversial public intellectual. In 2004 he was named among the world's most influential people by Time magazine, and he later served on a British government task force on extremism under former prime minister Tony Blair. He is also the grandson of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Islamist movement Muslim Brotherhood.

Jews Defunding NJ Public Schools & Funneling Billions to Private Yeshivas
Between 2014 and 2020, the school districts of Lakewood (New Jersey) and East Ramapo (New York) fell into a deep crisis. The core of the story is that the Hasidic and Ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities there became so large that they democratically gained the majority on the school boards.
In East Ramapo, the board from 2014 onwards consisted largely of Orthodox men whose own children attended private yeshivas.
Because they had no direct interest in the public schools, these boards decided to drastically cut funding for public education which they did not use themselves.
In East Ramapo, this led to the dismissal of over 400 teachers and the elimination of sports, art, and music for the 9,000 public school students, who primarily have African-American or Latino backgrounds.
In Lakewood, the deficit meanwhile rose to tens of millions of dollars because the budget was swallowed by the legal obligation to pay for bus transportation for more than 30,000 yeshiva students.
There were also scandals such as in 2014, when the East Ramapo board attempted to sell Hillcrest Elementary School for 3.2 million dollars to a Jewish institution, while the actual value was 5.9 million dollars.
In the following years, government regulators, such as the New York State Education Department, tried to stop this process. In 2016, a state monitor was appointed in East Ramapo with veto power over the budget.
In Lakewood, the ongoing crisis led the state of New Jersey, starting from 2024, to increasingly demand direct control over financial flows to prevent the public school system from collapsing entirely.

Compare this community, which curses, kicks people away, and spits on nuns, with the Christian Amish communities.

Purely for informational purposes. These images serve as historical source material to provide insight into the zeitgeist and ideology of that period.
"The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as DP [displaced persons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog."- Handwritten note by President Harry S. Truman dated July 21, 1947, summarising remarks made during a meeting with former Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. Source, click here
Why the history of exclusion still haunts us....
en het uitmoorden van duizenden Ghazanen zonder consequenties blijft
en kritiek op Israel blijft bestaan..
It is a historical fact that Jewish communities have been expelled from countless European cities and countries throughout the centuries. These waves of exclusion occurred in almost every part of the continent. In the Middle Ages, this led to dramatic events such as the expulsion from England at the end of the thirteenth century and the large-scale expulsions from France shortly thereafter.
One of the most dramatic moments in this history occurred at the end of the fifteenth century in the Iberian Peninsula. Here, Jews were forced to convert or leave their homelands of Spain and Portugal, leading to a massive dispersal of the Jewish population throughout the world. Similar expulsions regularly occurred in Central European cities like Vienna and Prague, often at the behest of rulers seeking forgiveness of debts to Jewish lenders or scapegoats for epidemics and social unrest.
Although the Enlightenment period brought greater tolerance, the most violent form of exclusion did not occur until the twentieth century during the Holocaust.
This, however, raises the fundamental question of the deeper reasons behind these recurring expulsions. One might wonder why certain sources, such as the book Mein Kampf or Hitler's speeches, are so difficult to access or rarely translated for the general public. It also raises debate about the way we study history and whether the current approach allows for different perspectives, or whether we are dealing with a one-sided historiography that avoids critical questions about the past.
A Prophetic Term? The 'Six Million' Holocaust Rhetoric After 1918
The article, titled "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!", was written by Martin H. Glynn, the former governor of New York. It was originally published in the American magazine The American Hebrew on October 31, 1919.

This article is particularly interesting because it introduces the terms "Holocaust" and "Six Million" as early as 1919. It applies these terms to the situation at the time, long before the rise of Nazism or World War II.The phrase '6 million Jews' was printed in newspapers 300 times before World War II even started.
Since the opening of the archives in the former Soviet Union in the 1990s, much new information has been added.
From Rhetoric to Recording: Why the Numbers Changed Over Time
Here are the most striking examples of how those figures have changed:
Auschwitz-Birkenau (The Biggest Correction)
This is the most famous example. Before 1990, the Soviet authorities used an official death toll of 4 million for Auschwitz. This figure was even included on the memorial plaques in the camp.
Old books often mentioned the 4 million figure (based on Soviet estimates immediately after liberation).
After the 1990s: Historians like Franciszek Piper gained access to the actual transport lists and records. The figure was revised to approximately 1.1 million.
At a conference in Tehran in 2006, Moshe Aryeh Friedman attracted international attention by publicly disputing the official death toll of six million Holocaust victims. Despite fierce criticism, he continued to question the historically established statistics of the genocide.

Incidentally, 15 million Christians were murdered during the Bolshevik Revolution, but apparently, that's not considered interesting. Most victims fell during the civil war and the worst persecutions under the communists Lenin and Stalin from 1917 to 1953. Christians are expected to keep quiet, while every other faith is put on a pedestal. Similarly, Christians didn't invent slavery (which is supported by the Bible and the history of Egypt and Mesopotamia, among other places), but they are the only ones held responsible for it. This is despite the fact that Christians actually ended slavery, while slavery still exists in certain Muslim countries like Afghanistan, Mauritania, and Libya.

From the Epstein files. Jeffrey Epstein's emails, released in 2025 and 2026, reveal that he repeatedly used the term "goyim" in a derogatory context. He often used the word to distinguish between what he perceived as Jewish intellectual or financial superiority and the rest of the world, which he considered inferior or naive.
In the email in the image, he states that it's "the Jew's way of making money," while he lets the gentiles "deal in the real world." This indicates a derogatory attitude in which he dismisses non-Jews as performing physical labor, while placing himself and his circle above those rules.
Mel Gibson, who was dismissed as a village idiot by Hollywood, was not mentioned once in those documents.
From that piece: "According to sources within the security services, media magnate Robert Maxwell was a Russian spy from the 1970s onward. At that time, he assisted in the transfer of Soviet Jews to Israel, in collaboration with the Israeli intelligence service Mossad."
Is it good news that Islam is invading Europe? It's excellent news! It's Israel's broom. [...] The coming of the Messiah will only occur when Edom, Christianity, Europe, is completely destroyed. - Rabbi David Touitou (in 2013)
In a world full of disinformation and selective reporting, the truth is often the first casualty. To ensure the integrity of this platform, I have subjected every quote and statement to factual accuracy review. Preventing misinformation is my absolute priority.


At 59, while filming his television show, Anthony Bourdain, who is half-Jewish, enthusiastically agreed that the "only solution" for mankind is for there to be "no White people anymore."
Exposure: Lobby groups dictate EU statements on Israel
David Cronin, a journalist for The Electronic Intifada, investigates the ties between the European Union and Israel. His work is based on official documents obtained through freedom of information requests (FOIA). These documents show that organizations such as ELNET and the European Jewish Association (EJA) maintain intensive contact with EU officials.
The documentation demonstrates that passages from proposals by these lobby groups are occasionally adopted directly into European Commission statements. This form of policy influence is a documented phenomenon within the Brussels political context.

Wealthy Cohen family tries to create multicultural 'Noah's Ark' by settling 70 refugee families in a small French town, but residents fight back

2022 (source) In the French village of Callac, the wealthy Cohen family is attempting to settle 70 refugee families through a utopian social experiment. Although the family themselves live in posh Parisian neighborhoods, they are willing to invest millions of euros from their own assets and taxpayers' money to realize their vision.Local residents are fiercely opposed to the Horizon Project. They point to the high unemployment rate of over 17 percent among the local population and question why newcomers are being prioritized.
Residents fear the loss of their local identity and the import of urban problems into the countryside. Critics emphasize that the Cohen family should not have to bear the consequences of the experiment themselves, while the community is largely financially self-sufficient after ten years.
A citizens' group is now demanding a referendum to keep the village's future in its own hands.
Tamara Finkelstein believes British nature reserves should be more diverse: plan to combat 'too white' countryside
2 feb 2026 UK (source Dailymail)
The plans follow a review commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), which warned that the countryside was seen as "definitely a white environment" and was at risk of becoming "irrelevant" in a multicultural society.
In the wake of the report, officials representing the National Landscapes—including the Cotswolds and Chilterns—have now published a series of management plans detailing their proposals to attract more minority communities. The Chiltern National Landscape will launch an outreach program in Luton and High Wycombe targeting Muslims. One factor that allegedly discourages ethnic minorities from visiting the countryside is "fear of off-leash dogs." The Cotswolds National Landscape specifically cited the Defra-commissioned report and said it is now committed to changing the facilities in an effort to reach "the broadest demographic."
Ardent promoter of multiculturalism for Australia says multiculturalism is bad for Israel
Isi Leibler on Australia: "It's necessary to come together and find a way for Australians to recapture that spirit of multiculturalism, which I think we're all proud to be a part of." Isi Leibler on Israel: "Multiculturalism has no place in Israel." (source)


Barbara Lerner Specter: Jews Play a "Leading Role" in Promoting Multiculturalism in Europe






Almost all the countries where it is illegal to deny the Holocaust have open borders. If you destroy nationalism, you destroy identity. If people are scattered and not united, they can be controlled.
Revealed: The retired Jewish lawyer who secretly orchestrated the return of ISIS brides
May 23, 2026 - Alliance between a Jewish human rights campaigner and ISIS-linked families has orchestrated most controversial homecoming in complete secrecy.
Robert Van Aalst, a retired Jewish human rights lawyer from Sydney, appears to be the central mastermind behind the scenes orchestrating the repatriation of Australian ISIS brides and their children from Syria. Although a doctor was the public face of the operation, Van Aalst directed the secret mission.
His role and actions can be summarized as follows:
Central coordination: He manages communications between families, intermediaries, and overseas contacts. He organizes confidential meetings and logistics, and selects Australians to travel to the Middle East to assist with the extraction.
Exclusive access: Due to his status as a lawyer, he gained access to some returned women in custody, which remained closed even to family members. Bond of trust: He earned the trust of ISIS-linked families through years of unpaid legal assistance and advocacy.
Extreme secrecy: Van Aalst demanded strict confidentiality. During meetings, phones and smartwatches had to be left in other rooms or cars to prevent leaks. Takeover of the network: After a previous failed attempt by others, he took charge and assumed control of the Syrian contacts, making him the dominant player in the network.
Woman in Australia suspected of links to terrorist organization
Australian authorities are charging a woman for joining a terrorist organization in Syria.
The police continue to investigate all adult women repatriated from Syrian camps.
Australian authorities have arrested a 34-year-old woman. She is accused of joining a terrorist organization and traveling to a conflict zone. According to the police, she traveled to Syria between 2013 and 2014 together with a man who is now reportedly detained in the Middle East. Kurdish forces arrested her in 2019 and subsequently held her in the al-Hawl refugee camp. She returned to Australia in September. If found guilty, she faces up to ten years in prison for each offense, AFP reports.
Australia brings back people from Syrian camps
Several people recently arrived in Melbourne, including a mother and daughter whom authorities detained upon arrival. Prosecutors accuse them of enslaving another woman while allegedly supporting IS in Syria since 2014. Authorities in Sydney also arrested a woman after her arrival; she was charged with entering a forbidden zone and with links to a terrorist organization. Critics, on the other hand, believe that those who left the country to join a terrorist organization must bear the consequences of that choice.
A leading Jewish refugee advocate has vowed that solidarity work with asylum seekers will continue despite growing harassment from far-right activists targeting Jewish organisations supporting refugees.
Rabbi David Mason, the executive director of the UK Jewish refugee charity HIAS+JCORE, said groups such as theirs had increasingly faced antisemitic abuse and conspiracy theories from far-right activists, most notably online.
"It's to frighten us," he said, adding that such abuse would not deter them from their work. "It's a badge of honour, in a way. I'm doing something and I'm determined, as a Jew and as someone who believes in a strong, cohesive Britain."
Mason said some of the hostility was driven by conspiracy theories such as the "great replacement", which falsely claims that Jews are orchestrating migration to undermine western societies. Similar antisemitic conspiracies were cited by the gunman who attacked three Jewish congregations in Pittsburgh, US, in 2018, targeting Jews he believed were helping refugees through organisations such as the US-based refugee agency HIAS.
Speaking at a Refugee Shabbat event in London aimed at highlighting Jewish solidarity with asylum seekers, Mason said many Jewish synagogues and community groups across the UK were continuing to support refugees, though this work was often less visible because of security concerns and rising antisemitism.


"We are prisoners here," say migrants in the detention camp in the Israeli desert
Human rights activists say Israel should be ashamed of its treatment of asylum seekers at Holot, a holding facility for "infiltrators" deep in the Negev Desert.

Eritreans who were 'encouraged to leave Israel'
A group of 30 people were killed earlier this week by the Islamic State, either by being shot or beheaded, the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants claimed. Three Christian men who were apparently executed in a video by jihadists in Libya were Eritrean refugees who left Israel under its draconian asylum policies, an Israeli organization said on Tuesday.
Israeli politician admits Jews use Holocaust and anti-Semitism to silence critics
In 2002, Jewish news commentator Amy Goodman, on her program Democracy Now, interviewed former Israeli parliamentarian and education minister Shulamit Aloni, who admitted that Zionist Jews cynically invoke the Holocaust and "antisemitism" to silence their critics:
Amy Goodman: We don't often hear your critical voice in the United States. When dissatisfaction with the Israeli government's policies is expressed here in the United States, people are often called antisemitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Shulamit Aloni: Well, it's a trick. We always use it when someone from Europe criticizes Israel; we bring up the Holocaust. When people in this country criticize Israel, they're considered "anti-Semitic."
And the organization is strong and has a lot of money. And the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong, and they are strong in this country, as you know. They have power, which is fine. They are talented, powerful people, and they have money, media, and other things. And their attitude is, "Israel, my country, whether it's right or wrong." The identification.
And they're unwilling to hear criticism. It's very easy to accuse people who criticize certain actions of the Israeli government of antisemitism, and to invoke the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people to justify everything we do to the Palestinians.
Deception is admitted by the author
100,000? 192,000? 40,000? Counting remains a challenge.


Snip, snap, snout, this tale's told out.
The Dark Origins of the Gas Van: Developed by the Jewish Isai Berg
Most people associate gas vans with the horrors of the Second World War. However, few know that the technique of killing people with exhaust fumes during transport was devised earlier in the Soviet Union. The mastermind behind this method was Isai Berg, an officer of the secret service, the NKVD.
Isai Berg was of Jewish descent. He was born into a Jewish family in Moscow in 1905. Within the early Soviet states and the secret service (NKVD), a relatively high number of people with Jewish backgrounds were employed during that period.
During the Great Purge of the 1930s under Joseph Stalin, mass executions took place in Moscow. The pressure on execution squads was immense. Isai Berg, then head of the economic department of the NKVD in Moscow, sought a way to make this process more 'efficient.' The prisoners had to be transported from the prison to the firing ranges outside the city.
In 1937, Berg came up with a gruesome solution: he had trucks converted into mobile gas chambers. The cargo area was made airtight and the exhaust pipe was directed inside. While the truck drove to the execution site, the prisoners in the hold were unknowingly killed by carbon monoxide poisoning. Upon arrival, the bodies only had to be buried.
The technological origins of this weapon lie in the cold bureaucracy of the left-wing communist Soviet Union under Stalin.
Israel largest export is diamonds. There are zero diamond mines in Israel.
The diamond sector in parts of Africa faces historical and current major problems with human rights violations, forced labor, and dangerous working conditions in illegal or poorly regulated mines. Additionally, so-called blood diamonds or conflict diamonds became known because the proceeds from them were used to finance civil wars and rebel groups.
Swedish journalist Donald Boström wrote an article for Aftonbladet in 2009, where he said that Israel was stealing Palestinian organs. The world is still silent.




Did you know that..
- 150,000 Jewish soldiers served in Hitler's army, according to research by historian Bryan Mark Rigg. This figure does not refer to practicing Jews, but to individuals of partial Jewish descent, as defined by the Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935. Some high-ranking officers received a declaration of German blood signed by Hitler to remain in service. The majority, however, consisted of soldiers with one or two Jewish grandparents. They fought not for the Germans, but for a common enemy: the Soviet Union. Many soldiers of Jewish descent, particularly those from Finland or those who identified as German patriots, saw Bolshevism and Joseph Stalin as a greater immediate threat to their homeland or European civilization than Nazism at the time. For Finnish Jews, the fight against the Soviet Union was a survival struggle for their own independence, on which they happened to be on the same side as Germany.
- On April 10, 1948, Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Shepard Rifkin. Rifkin was the executive director of the "American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel," a group that supported the Zionist militia Lehi (also known as the Stern Gang).
The exact text of the letter reads: "If a real and final catastrophe were to befall us in Palestine, the British would be primarily responsible, and the terrorist organizations that emerged from our own ranks second. I am not prepared to see anyone associated with these misguided and criminal people." Einstein wrote this out of anger over the massacre in Deir Yassin, which had recently been perpetrated by Jewish militias.
The Germans even had an Indian SS unit.
Fifteen million dead in Congo and not a soul cares, but for the other we are forced to be silent every year.

King Leopold II of Belgium ruled Congo as his private property for 23 years. He had the limbs of Congolese people cut off if they did not meet their daily quotas on the plantations. By the end of his reign, 15 million Congolese people had perished. Yet we are only taught about Hitler.

Holodomor 1932-1933: when communism intentionally starved 7 million people to death


No endless Hollywood films, extensive history lessons, or fully booked museums for these victims.


Massacre of millions of Christians by Jews before Hitler rose to power
SS generals stood trial at Nuremberg while the Soviets were never prosecuted for the rape of over 2,000,000 women and girls, with nearly 100,000 in Berlin alone, and the 240,000 deaths that resulted from it.
While the Holocaust is commemorated worldwide, the systematic persecution by the Bolsheviks remains under-illuminated, in which millions of Christians were executed or perished in work camps and state-induced famines without the perpetrators being internationally prosecuted. Trotsky was part of a collective leadership under the Jewish Vladimir Lenin and was later exiled and murdered by Stalin. The persecutions continued on an even larger scale after his departure.
The Bolsheviks not only mass-murdered millions of Christians prior to WWII, they also executed thousands of priests, imprisoned them in Soviet prisons and the work camps of the Gulag, and burned down, demolished, or repurposed more than 40,000 Christian churches.
Under the rule of the Bolsheviks, a systematic persecution of religion took place in the Soviet Union. A central figure in this campaign was the Jewish Yemelyan Yaroslavsky, the leader of the League of Militant Atheists. The violent actions of the state were directly aimed at destroying Christianity and other religious beliefs in favor of the communist system.
With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading communists who seized power in Russia between 1917 and 1920 were Jews.
Leon Trotsky headed the Red Army and was, for a time, chief of Soviet foreign affairs.
Yakov Sverdlov was both the executive secretary of the Bolshevik party and, as chairman of the Central Executive Committee, the head of the Soviet government.
Karl Radek was Vice-Commissar for Foreign Affairs, taking part in the Brest-Litovsk treaty negotiations, as well as being responsibley, for the campaign against the Don Cossackar. He was also, for a time, military commander of the Eighth Army, despite protests from Stalin.we now know that Lenin was also at least a quarter Jewish.
Despite all the propaganda that wants you to believe that the stories of the involvement of Jews in the Russian Revolution are myths, it was a well-known fact at the time. It was acknowledged by many figures, including Jews themselves:
Captain Montgomery Schuyler sent two reports to Washington in March and June 1919, describing in graphic detail the Jewish role in the Russian Revolution. Both these reports were only declassified in September 1957 and the originals are still held in the U
The first report, sent from Omsk on 1 March 1919, contains the following
On February 8, 1920, Winston Churchill expressed his alarm over world developments in an interview published inf arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about ofers."
This is just to show you that the Jewish role in Bolshevism was a commonly known fact which was acknowledged even by people who weren't necessarily enemies of the Jews.ke Rabbi Harry Waton, who wrote in his book A program for the Jew and humanity: "The communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that the triumph of communism in the Russian Revolution is the triumph of Judaism."
Approximately 9 million deaths occurred under Lenin alone between 1917-1924 due to the Civil War of 1918-1923, the resulting famines, and massacres of dissidents. One of the very first laws passed by the new communist regime of Lenin in 1917 was the "Anti-Semitism Act," making it a crime even to criticize Jews, punishable by death or time in a Siberian work camp.
Some people like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize in Literature in 1970, estimate the total deaths under the Soviet regime at 66 million between 1917 and 1957.
Professor Rudolph Rummel of the University of Hawaii calculated that 61.9 million people were systematically murdered by the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1987.
Even the Israeli journalist Sever Plocker acknowledges the predominant Jewish role among the Bolsheviks and admits the genocide is at least 20 million by saying: "Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history."
Why did the Nazis burn books by Freud and the Bolsheviks?
colloquially called 'the porn stash'
Understanding the underlying motivations of others, no matter how controversial, is essential for recognizing patterns in history. Everything has a cause, and actions often stem from a specific logic or a perceived threat. By analyzing how the Nazis interpreted certain theories and political events, you gain insight into the motivation behind their actions. This insight is not intended to justify actions, but to understand how ideologies emerge and why people resort to extreme measures like book burnings.


Sigmund Freud was of Jewish descent, and his work was labeled "Jewish pornography" by the Nazis. He argued that a boy is unconsciously attracted to his mother and sees his father as competition. Regarding the female counterpart, he argued that a daughter is attracted to her father.
These theories, along with pornographic and communist books, were burned because the Nazis saw them as an attack on German morality and the family. The motivation for Nazi aggression stemmed from the enemy image of "Judeo-Bolshevism." They pointed to the millions of Christians murdered by communist Bolsheviks and saw this as a direct consequence of Jewish ideologies (Karl Marx, for example, was Jewish). From their perspective, the fight against these books and groups was a necessary defense of civilization.
On May 6, 1933, Nazi students looted the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, founded in 1919 by the Jewish physician Magnus Hirschfeld. This institute was a world pioneer in the field of sexology and performed one of the first modern gender-affirming surgeries in 1930.
During the book burning on May 10, 1933, tens of thousands of books and scholarly archives on sexuality, gender identity, and early transgender care from the institute's library were destroyed.
After the book burnings came the decree against Freemasonry, which took place on January 8, 1934. By 1939, almost all members of the Rothschild family had been forced to flee Germany and Austria.

Controversial views on post-war Europe and Hitler's legacy
General George S. Patton was a high-ranking American commander during World War II, known for his leadership of the Third Army in Europe. After the German surrender in 1945, he became increasingly critical of the Allies' political choices.
He wrote in his private diaries and letters that the destruction of Germany was a strategic mistake, as he believed the country was the only barrier against Soviet communism. He fiercely criticized the Soviets, whom he described as barbarians, and advocated deploying the army directly against them before they became too powerful. He criticized denazification and publicly compared Nazi membership to membership in American political parties, which led to his resignation as military governor of Bavaria.
Patton died unexpectedly in 1945 after a car accident.
John F. Kennedy wrote the following in his diary in the summer of 1945: "After visiting these places, you can easily understand how Hitler will emerge in a few years from the hatred that now surrounds him as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had a boundless ambition for his country, which made him a danger to world peace, but he had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the manner of his death, which will live and grow after him. He had the stuff of which legends are made."




John Money forced a boy into a failed sex experiment with tragic consequences. Alfred Kinsey used data from child abusers for his statistics on sexuality. Michel Foucault signed petitions to legalize sex between adults and minors. Volkmar Sigusch advocated for radical sexual liberation and the blurring of moral boundaries.
Current state Hungary 2026: Szivárvány TV has applied for a broadcasting license with Hungary's NMHH to operate as a 24-hour LGBTQ+ channel. This development occurred immediately following the departure of Viktor Orbán and follows a ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union that invalidated previous Hungarian media restrictions. The shift is linked to the rise of Péter Magyar, whose leadership in 2026 marks a move toward aligning with EU legal standards.
During the Nazi regime in Germany, the most aggressive anti-smoking campaign of its time was conducted. In the late 1930s, German scientists were the first to establish a definitive epidemiological link between smoking and lung cancer, coining the term passive smoking. To curb smoking, the government imposed strict restrictions on tobacco advertising and banned smoking in public places such as trams, buses, and government buildings. Strict rules also applied within the armed forces; the Luftwaffe introduced a smoking ban in 1938, and the SS followed suit in 1939 for commissioned officers. While daily rations were limited to six cigarettes, non-smokers received extra food or chocolate as a reward to encourage them not to smoke.
Titled "Die Vernegerung Frankreichs in 100 Jahren" ("The Negation of France in 100 Years"), it was intended to stoke racial fear and cultural unrest in the wake of France's use of colonial troops during and after World War I.
The scene depicts two fashionably dressed white Europeans sitting in a circular enclosure, watched and studied by a crowd of well-dressed Black spectators, thus reversing the colonial gaze. A sign reads "Défense de donner à manger" ("No feeding"), a phrase common in zoos at the time, while the caption beneath it declares that "French people of color" have become the main attraction of the Paris Zoo.
The artwork reflects the widespread German resentment against France's deployment of African soldiers, particularly the Senegalese Tirailleurs, during the post-war occupation of the Rhineland. This resentment was racialized and weaponized in Nazi propaganda through the concept of "Schwarze Schmach" or "Black Shame," which portrayed African troops as a racial and moral threat to European civilization.
Rather than a genuine vision of the future, this cartoon was a projection of the racial anxieties of the time, intended to mock French colonial policy and multicultural society. It is a striking example of how racial caricatures and inversions were used in early 20th-century European media to maintain white supremacy and resist decolonization.
Such images played a role in laying the ideological foundation for the Nazi regime's racial policies, by reinforcing the belief that racial purity was threatened by cultural and colonial mixing.
© History Pictures


History education in the West focuses heavily on the crimes of Adolf Hitler (child benefits, highways, etc.), while the enormous death tolls under communist leaders like Mao Zedong (40 to 80 million) and Joseph Stalin (20 to 30 million) remain underexposed. This raises the question of why the atrocities of communism are less prominent in the collective European memory than those of National Socialism.
During the Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946), leading figures of the Nazi regime were tried for war crimes. American prison psychologist Gustave Gilbert was tasked with assessing the mental state of the 21 most prominent prisoners. He used the Wechsler-Bellevue intelligence test.
The results showed that most defendants scored well above average. The highest score went to Hjalmar Schacht (143), while Hermann Göring and Karl Dönitz both scored 138. The group average was 128, which is well above the general population average of 100.
Gilbert published these findings in 1947 in his book "Nuremberg Diary".
Chris Langan, with an IQ estimated at between 195 and 210, has repeatedly spoken out in interviews and on social media about the "Great Replacement" and accused specific groups, including "Zionist bankers," of plotting genocide against the white race.
Nazis had high IQs, should we ban intelligence?
Recognizing patterns is a core component of fluid intelligence. This allows you to solve complex problems, make logical connections, and process new information without specific prior knowledge. In the current public debate, there is a debate about the interpretation of patterns. Critics argue that statistics about the origins of perpetrators are sometimes selectively presented or omitted to avoid stigmatization, while others warn that such patterns without context can lead to incorrect conclusions.
The wonderful world of low IQ
No order and reason
In the case of 24-year-old Arnold Oforiwaa from Zoetermeer, the Dutch court ruled that the man killed his 22-year-old partner, Jihaneve, with 258 stab wounds in front of their baby. After the crime, the perpetrator took pictures of the victim and a selfie with the child. Due to a diagnosed very low IQ and psychosis, he was declared of diminished responsibility, resulting in a five-year prison sentence plus compulsory psychiatric treatment.
In France, a court ruled that 67-year-old Ousmane Diallo was not criminally responsible for the fatal stabbing of 18-year-old shop assistant Théo. The attack followed a dispute over a €93 phone bill. The judge followed the advice of psychiatrists who ruled that Diallo was completely insane due to severe mental disability and a low IQ at the time of the crime. He was subsequently ordered to stay in a psychiatric hospital.
In 2024, Anthony Esan attacked a soldier in England, stabbing him seventy times and attempting to behead him. This perpetrator also suffered from serious mental health issues.


Silenced Voices: Survivor Testimonies and the Physical Reality of the Wreck
For years, one of the central debates surrounding the RMS Titanic sinking was whether the ship went down intact or broke apart before sinking. Many survivors claimed it split in two, but their accounts were often questioned due to the darkness, confusion, and distance during the disaster.

Ruth Becker was among those who consistently maintained that she saw the ship break, and her account gained credibility after the wreck was discovered in 1985. When Robert Ballard and his team located the Titanic on the floor of the North Atlantic, the long-standing question was finally resolved. The wreck was found in two major sections—the bow and stern—separated by a large debris field, confirming that the ship had indeed broken apart.
This discovery validated the testimonies of survivors whose observations had been doubted for decades.
The claim that a treasurer from the Titanic Historical Society took Becker's microphone during a 1982 interview is often repeated, and Don Lynch has shared a version of the story in later documentaries. However, that specific detail is best treated with some caution unless directly sourced, as it mainly appears in secondary retellings rather than clear primary transcripts.
What is firmly established is that survivors like Becker—and others such as Eva Hart—insisted the ship broke apart, and the 1985 discovery ultimately proved their accounts were accurate.
This is why historical revisionism, in-depth research, and the testimonies of eyewitnesses are so essential. Currently, history is written entirely by the victors, resulting in a one-sided perspective. Nowadays, merely asking critical questions is often met with immediate hostility, criminalization, and ostracization.
The book "Germany Must Perish!"
In March 1941, the book "Germany Must Perish!", written by Theodore N. Kaufman, appeared in the United States. Kaufman (1910–1986) was a Jewish-American businessman and publicist from Newark, New Jersey. Kaufman was convinced that the German people possessed a deep-rooted urge for war and that the world would only be safe if the German nation were to disappear completely. This while Hitler constantly indicated that he did not want war.
In the 104-page pamphlet, Kaufman advocated for a radical and extreme plan:
following an Allied victory, the entire German population under sixty years of age (for men) and under forty-five (for women) had to be forcibly sterilized.
He calculated that around 20,000 surgeons could complete this task within three months. Due to natural mortality, the German people would be completely extinct within two generations, after which the territory could be divided among the neighboring countries. In the United States, the book was hardly taken seriously and was largely ignored or dismissed as the work of a radical loner.
It served as a powerful propaganda tool to strengthen the motivation for total war and to justify the escalation of the persecution of the Jews and the Holocaust to their own population under the guise of self-defense. In Germany, on the other hand, the book was immediately picked up by the Ministry of Propaganda led by Joseph Goebbels.
The National Socialists used the pamphlet as proof of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy that was bent on the total destruction of the German people. Parts of the text were translated and distributed in millions of copies among the German population and the soldiers at the front.

"Judea Declares War on Germany" is the famous front-page headline of the British newspaper Daily Express, published on March 24, 1933. This was well before the outbreak of the Second World War (which began in September 1939).
Hitler invades Poland
In 1939, there were eyewitness accounts with testimonies about violence against ethnic Germans by Polish soldiers and civilians in the border region.
Historians later thoroughly investigated these reports and concluded that there were indeed tensions, arrests, and incidents at the time in which ethnic Germans died, such as during Bloody Sunday in Bydgoszcz (Bromberg).
Never ceasing attacks on traditionalism


Born in London in 1982 to a Jewish family, Zoe Strimpel spent much of her childhood in Boston before returning to England at sixteen. After attending Bedales School, she studied English at Cambridge and earned a master's degree in gender studies.

Jesse Owens from the US and Lutz Long from Germany (Summer Olympic Games in National Socialist Germany, 1936).
You have probably heard it before, the uneducated remark: "If you weren't blond-haired and blue-eyed, you would have been an enemy to Hitler." See some photos here.




Firefighters vs. Invasion Plans

During the Nuremberg trials, this notable moment of laughter occurred when prosecutor Robert Jackson believed he was presenting a secret plan for the invasion of the Rhineland.
The defendants, including Hermann Göring, mocked him because the document actually detailed the organization of fire departments and street cleaning.
They found it comical that the Americans mistook civil logistics for a strategic attack plan.
Additionally, there was often cynical laughter in the docks regarding translation errors or testimonies about internal power struggles within the party.
Torturing for a Confession or Putting to Work for Personal Gain
Immediately after World War II, the US government secretly brought around 1,600 Nazi scientists to the US through Operation Paperclip to work on military projects. A well-known example is the German engineer and SS member Wernher von Braun. He was recruited for the American space program (NASA) and appeared regularly on American television in the 1950s and 1960s, including in a three-part Walt Disney documentary series to promote space exploration. (This theme also appears in fiction, such as the series The Man in the High Castle or the game Wolfenstein).
At the same time, a very different, lesser-known side of history was unfolding in Europe. While top scientists were being brought in, lower-ranking Nazi suspects were dealt with harshly during trials such as the Malmedy massacre trial in Dachau. Because there was no documentary evidence for specific massacres in the field, investigators depended entirely on confessions. Under extreme time pressure to close hundreds of cases quickly, inexperienced American interrogators turned to torture and intimidation as a shortcut. The American treatment of Nazis thus had two faces: covering up and recruiting top figures for their own military gain, and forcing confessions from lower-ranking military personnel through torture due to time pressure and retribution.
The Historical Context of the First Crusade
Another Bit of History
Christians had been enslaved and killed for centuries by the Muslims. Here's what happened:
Muslim armies began conquering Christian lands in the 630s. Syria fell in 639, Egypt in 642, and soon Christian North Africa followed.
Then in 711, Muslim armies invaded Spain and even pushed into France before finally being stopped at the Battle of Tours in 732.
The First Crusade was not called until 1095.
In other words, Christian lands had been invaded and conquered for roughly 450 years before the Crusades ever began.
The immediate crisis came later with the Seljuk Turks. In 1071, the Byzantine Empire suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Manzikert, and much of Christian Anatolia fell to the Turks.
With its territory collapsing and Constantinople itself under threat, the Byzantine Empire formally asked the West for military help.
And so, Pope Urban II called the First Crusade.
The Charge That Saved Europe: The True Story of Vienna 1683
In September 1683, an Ottoman army of approximately 100,000 to 150,000 soldiers besieged Vienna. After two months of mining and shelling, the city was in a critical state. Pope Innocent XI sent urgent appeals across Europe to form a relief coalition, providing significant financial subsidies to bring often-conflicting nations together. This diplomatic effort created the Holy League, a military alliance consisting of the Holy Roman Empire (led by the Habsburgs), the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and the Republic of Venice.
This alliance meant the defense was a collective European effort rather than a solo mission. The relief force of nearly 80,000 troops included roughly 27,000 Poles and 53,000 soldiers from various German states within the Holy Roman Empire, such as Bavaria, Saxony, and Franconia. On September 12, 1683, King Jan III Sobieski of Poland held overall command of these combined forces.
The battle concluded with a massive cavalry charge of roughly 18,000 horsemen. This charge was led by approximately 3,000 Polish Winged Hussars, who acted as the spearhead to break the Ottoman lines. The victory ended the siege and marked the beginning of a long decline in Ottoman expansion in Central Europe.




Israel's chemical spraying on farmland in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza targets civilians' essential resources. Destroying private property on this scale without military necessity is a war crime and threatens food security and livelihoods
Israeli settlers poisoning and sabotaging Palestinian water sources
Various human rights organizations and international media have documented reports of Palestinian water sources being contaminated by Israeli settlers. In August 2025, video footage from Sa'ir in the West Bank showed settlers pushing a goat into a communal well and climbing into it themselves, rendering a crucial drinking water supply unusable for the local population. These incidents are not isolated. In the village of Madama, Oxfam reported seven different cases between 2002 and 2005 where trash and diapers were dumped into the village's only spring.
There are also reports of chemical contamination, such as in 2005, when Amnesty International confirmed that the prohibited poison 2-Fluoroacetamide had been spread over grazing lands in the Hebron region.
These actions are part of a broader pattern of sabotage against water infrastructure. Reports from the United Nations and the Norwegian Refugee Council point to the discharge of untreated wastewater from settlements onto Palestinian agricultural land.
An analysis by the Pacific Institute in 2025 found that over 250 attacks were carried out on water and sanitation facilities over a five-year period.
Furthermore, historical context from 1948, supported by declassified military documents and Red Cross archives, indicates the use of typhoid and dysentery to make water sources in Acre and Gaza unusable.

Argetina
In December 2011, the then 23-year-old Israeli tourist Rotem Singer caused a major forest fire in the Torres del Paine National Park in Chile, near the border with Argentina. At the time, he confessed that the fire started after he burned toilet paper, which escalated due to high winds. The fire destroyed more than 17,000 hectares of nature. Although the incident took place in Chile, the smoke and ecological consequences also crossed the border into Argentine territories.
In January 2026, accusations surfaced again in Argentina against an Israeli tourist. This tourist was detained by authorities in Los Glaciares National Park (Patagonia) because he was in a prohibited zone near active fire centers.
Former ICC Prosecutor: Israel intimidated me, Netherlands did nothing
Former ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda states that she was intimidated by Israel in The Hague in 2015. Among other incidents, an envelope containing 500 dollars was delivered to her home to demonstrate that her address was known, and the head of the Mossad later pressured her to halt investigations into Israel. Bensouda immediately reported this to the Dutch authorities, but states that no investigation was launched and that the Netherlands, as the host country, failed to support her.
Israel does not recognize the legitimacy of the ICC and has been trying to thwart the court's work for years. Previous investigations have already revealed that ICC staff members have been extensively spied on, wiretapped, and threatened by Israeli intelligence services.
Recently, the Israeli Minister of Finance, Bezalel Smotrich, claimed that a secret arrest warrant has been requested against him due to his role in the illegal occupation policy on the Westelijke Jordaanoever. This warrant may have been leaked through espionage at the court.
Mexico
The current president of Mexico is Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. She is the first female president in the history of the country. Her grandparents were Jewish immigrants who fled to Mexico from Lithuania and Bulgaria during the last century.
The 2024 election period was one of the bloodiest in Mexico's modern history. In the run-up to the elections, at least 37 candidates for various political positions were shot dead. Yet she remained and remains unharmed. It is a miracle.
Where is the money?
While we blindly embrace old stereotypes, those same billions from the oil sector quietly flow into Western universities. It's no coincidence that criticism on our campuses often goes in one direction: a mouthful about Gaza, but not a word about Iran.
The only democracy in the Middle East is condemned, while the financiers of our educational institutions-authoritarian regimes-remain unscathed. Jewish philanthropy is often cited as the driving force behind multiculturalism and societal transition. But while we debate that, billions from the Arab world are buying direct influence over our universities and think tanks. Who really decides what gets discussed in our classrooms and on the news? Follow the money, but look at all flows.
AND they want you to die for them in their wars

The Samaritans: a small people with a big story
The Samaritans are one of the most remarkable and least understood communities of antiquity. Their history runs like a thin but unbroken thread from the Old Testament period to the present day. While many ancient peoples disappeared or were completely absorbed into other cultures, the Samaritans-against all odds-persisted. And that makes them one of the most remarkable living remnants of the biblical world.
Originally, the Samaritans were the inhabitants of the northern kingdom of Israel. After the Assyrian conquest in the 8th century BCE, they remained in the land and continued to adhere to their own tradition, based on the first five books of Moses. Their holy place was not Jerusalem, but Mount Gerizim, which they saw as God's chosen place. This religious difference formed the core of a centuries-long hostility between Samaritans and Jews. The Jews often regarded them as a "mixed" people who had abandoned true worship, while the Samaritans, on the other hand, believed they had remained faithful to the original teachings of Moses. Thus, a deep rift grew, fueled by mutual distrust, religious rivalry, and historical wounds.
It is precisely in this context that Jesus' actions are so striking. Where his contemporaries viewed Samaritans as enemies, he consciously crossed this boundary. He spoke openly with a Samaritan woman at the well—an encounter unthinkable by the social norms of the time. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, he went even further: he made a Samaritan a model of true charity, while the religious leaders of his own people were lacking. In doing so, he radically reversed the prevailing judgment. Jesus showed that dignity and compassion are not bound by origin, tradition, or past conflicts.
What makes this story even more remarkable is that the Samaritans still exist. Not as a symbolic memory, but as a living community of approximately 900 people. They live in two places: in Holon near Tel Aviv and in Kiryat Luza on Mount Gerizim, near Nablus. They adhere to their own Torah, their own priestly lineage, and their age-old rituals. Genetic and historical studies confirm that they are truly descended from the same community mentioned in the Bible. It is as if a small piece of the world of Moses, Ezra, and Jesus is still tangibly present.
Despite their location in a politically volatile region, the Samaritans rarely engage with modern ideologies. They are neither Zionists nor Palestinian nationalists. Their community literally lives on both sides of the conflict, and their survival depends on neutrality and good relations with everyone around them. Their identity is religious and historical, not political.
That this small group—persecuted, marginalized, and nearly extinct for centuries—still exists is remarkable in itself. But the fact that they also form a direct link to the world of the Bible makes them unique. The Samaritans are a silent reminder of how ancient, complex, and layered the history of the Holy Land is. And perhaps also of how tenacious identity can be, even when everything around you is changing.
Jesus shows that old enmities are not sacred. That you don't have to keep thinking the way "people" have always thought. He broke through a barrier that was almost self-evident in his time: Jews and Samaritans didn't interact, period. And that's precisely where he stepped right through.
See the person first, not the label. Jesus didn't look at origins, group, reputation, or history. He looked at someone's heart. Prejudices are often heritage, not truth. The enmity between Jews and Samaritans was centuries old. But Jesus showed that something old isn't necessarily good. Goodness can come from those you least expect. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, He makes the "enemy" the example of love and humanity. Dignity isn't tied to identity. Jesus gave dignity to people who had been discarded by society.
The beauty is that He didn't present this as theory, but as practice. He engaged in conversation, He listened, He saw someone others didn't want to see.
For Jesus, faith isn't a "club boundary," but an invitation. Not: "You don't belong," but: "This is the path I offer you."
And that makes it less harsh than it seems at first glance. Because in his encounters, you never see exclusion. You see openness, dialogue, respect, and above all: space. And that's what we also saw in Charlie Kirk's debates.
For example, with the Samaritan woman, He doesn't say, "You don't belong here." He says, "I see you. And I offer you something."
So it's not about hostility versus faith. It's about love without limits, and a message that He Himself fully supports.


































